Neurodivergence does not cause domestic abuse. Domestic abuse is about a desire to exert power and control over others; this is a learnt behaviour, and the person using violence is making a choice to behave abusively. In contrast, neurodivergence is a lifelong and innate neuro-cognitive difference. Statistically, Neurodivergent people are more likely to be victims of domestic violence and less likely to report their abuse or seek professional support than neurotypical people23 24. Neurodivergent people are already heavily stigmatised and disadvantaged in their everyday lives. It is important therefore never to make assumptions about a person’s behaviour based on their neurodivergence, or attribute abusive behaviour to a person’s neurodivergence. Neurodivergent men who use violence in intimate relationships are likely to have experienced multiple forms of interpersonal and structural harm across their lives, including poor early care experiences, stigmatisation, discrimination, exclusion, and isolation25. These experiences can generate feelings of shame and anxiety, which may manifest as defensive behaviours that can be challenging to navigate in intervention settings26. While working at the intersection of anxiety, shame, and gendered entitlement is important when supporting many men who use violence27, interventions must be both physically and relationally accessible. Doing so helps avoid reproducing harm while also enhancing safety for victim-survivors. In part 5 of the guide, we will explore ways in which practitioners can be more responsive to Neurodivergent clients28 29.
References
(23) Somerset Domestic Abuse Service. Neurodiversity and domestic abuse: understanding the hidden risks. See also Fox, J. (2025). The impact of intersectional disadvantage on Autistic women’s experiences of interpersonal violence: A narrative review.
Back to text
(24) Pearson, A., Botha, M., Rose, K., Mitchell, A., Joseph, W., Douglas, S., & Sedgewick, F. (2024). “It’s a long process, and it’s a long journey”: Autistic adults’ experiences of support and recovery after experiencing intimate violence and abuse. Autism in Adulthood.
Back to text
(25) Renehan, N. (2024). Foregrounding meaning and motive in the domestic abuse perpetration of and response to neurodivergent men. Deviant Behavior, 45(12), 1682–1697.
Back to text
(26) Dolezal, L., & Gibson, M. (2022). Beyond a trauma-informed approach and towards shame-sensitive practice. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 214.
Back to text
(27) Vlais (2025). Addressing violence and controlling behaviours associated with possessive jealousy amongst adult users of domestic, family and sexual violence.
Back to text
(28) Dolezal, L., & Gibson, M. (2022). Beyond a trauma-informed approach and towards shame-sensitive practice. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 214.
Back to text
(29) Scott, K. L., & Jenney, A. (2023). Safe not soft: trauma- and violence-informed practice with perpetrators as a means of increasing safety. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 32(7–8), 1088–1107.
Back to text